Case 4108403/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lewis Hewitt v Buf Ayr Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4108403/2022
- Decision date
- 22 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
- Venue
- Glasgow remotely
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Lewis Hewitt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Hewitt was employed as one of two head chefs at Buf Ayr Ltd and on 28 September 2022 gave four weeks' notice that he intended to resign and relocate to Glasgow. The tribunal found that the parties' relationship was generally good, that the claimant's notice was given orally in amicable circumstances, and that on 5 October 2022 manager Kevin Finnie told the claimant and Ross Butler that the respondent wanted a clean break and that they should leave that day.
The tribunal preferred the claimant's evidence over the respondent's account that he had wanted to leave immediately for a new job. It noted that Mr Finnie did not give evidence, that Mr Paton's account of the meeting was hearsay, and that there was no contemporaneous written record from the respondent supporting its version. The tribunal held that the respondent, not the claimant, effected the termination on 5 October 2022 and that the claimant had remained willing to work until the end of his four-week notice period on 26 October 2022.
On that basis the tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages in relation to October 2022 pay and accrued holiday pay, and a breach of contract in ending the employment before the notice period expired. It referred to section 13 and section 27 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Working Time Regulations 1998, and the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994.
Remedy was assessed net of tax or other statutory deductions. The tribunal awarded £31.60 for the October 2022 pay shortfall, £590.77 for accrued holiday pay, and £1,265.94 for three weeks' notice pay damages. The total award was £1,888.31, with any tax or other statutory deductions payable by the respondent if due.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | October 2022 net pay underpayment; the tribunal accepted the claimant had worked one week in October 2022 and had been underpaid against his normal net weekly wage. | Upheld | — | £32 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued holiday pay on termination under the Working Time Regulations 1998, calculated for 13 weeks' service at 1.4 weeks' entitlement. | Upheld | — | £591 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for three weeks of notice pay after the tribunal found the respondent ended employment on 5 October 2022 instead of allowing the notice period to run to 26 October 2022. | Upheld | — | £1,266 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,888
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 27 ERA 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998 Regulations 13, 13A and 14
- Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.