Case 4108426/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Moyes v Café Ceardach Ltd. Private Limited Company — 2023
- Case reference
- 4108426/2022
- Decision date
- 9 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Moyes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent made under Rule 64 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. Employment Judge M Robison recorded that Mrs M Moyes was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £720, notice pay of £480 net, and holiday pay of £440 net.
The judgment stated that the claimant's claim was limited to those sums and that the respondent accepted those payments were due. No contested findings of fact, wider liability findings, or separate remedy calculations were set out beyond the three agreed amounts.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Judgment by consent under Rule 64; the respondent accepted this statutory redundancy payment was due. | Upheld | — | £720 |
| Breach of contract | Judgment by consent under Rule 64; the respondent accepted notice pay of £480 net was due. | Upheld | — | £480 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment by consent under Rule 64; the respondent accepted holiday pay of £440 net was due. | Upheld | — | £440 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,640
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 64 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.