Case 4108452/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108452/2015 Mr D Ross v Knorr-Bremse Railservices (UK) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4108452/2015
- Decision date
- 17 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108452/2015 Mr D Ross
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Ross brought a claim against Knorr-Bremse Railservices (UK) Limited. In the extracted judgment text, the tribunal does not record any substantive findings on liability, evidence, or remedy. It records only that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant.
Employment Judge Robert Gall therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment is dated 17 October 2019 and sent to the parties on the same date.
No monetary award is recorded, and the extracted text contains no panel members or other procedural detail beyond the dismissal following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The extracted judgment text does not state the substantive statutory basis of the claim; the claim is identified from the case listing context as a working time matter. The claim was withdrawn by the claimant and then dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.