Case 4108456/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108456/2015 & others Miss I Brown & others v (See attached schedule) Capita Life and Pension Regulated Services Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4108456/2015
- Decision date
- 27 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108456/2015 & others Miss I Brown & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a multiple claim brought by Miss Brown, Ms Hainey, Ms Holloway and Ms Lyden against Capita Life and Pension Regulated Services Ltd. The judgment records that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted text does not include any findings on the substantive merits of the underlying claims, and no remedy was awarded. The judgment is dated 17 August 2018 and was entered in the register and copied to the parties on 27 August 2018.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The claims were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The extracted judgment text does not set out any substantive merits decision. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The claims were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The extracted judgment text does not set out any substantive merits decision. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The claims were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The extracted judgment text does not set out any substantive merits decision. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The claims were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The extracted judgment text does not set out any substantive merits decision. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.