Case 4108457/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108457/2015 & Others Mr D Garry & Others v (See attached schedule) Capita Life and Pension Regulated Services Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4108457/2015
- Decision date
- 9 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108457/2015 & Others Mr D Garry & Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed them under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability or any monetary award. It identifies the cases as 4108457/2015, Mr Daniel Garry, and 4108461/2015, Mr Richard Swan, against Capita Life and Pension Regulated Services Ltd.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Mr Daniel Garry (4108457/2015). The extracted judgment text records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52; it does not specify the substantive claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Mr Richard Swan (4108461/2015). The extracted judgment text records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52; it does not specify the substantive claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.