Case 4108528/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108528/2022 Mr P Kolakouic v Metatec Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4108528/2022
- Decision date
- 4 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108528/2022 Mr P Kolakouic
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the case was decided on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that Metatec Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr P Kolakouic’s wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £5,110.79 gross, described as the total of the deductions from wages for September 2022 to December 2022. The judgment itemised those deductions as £1,275.14 for September 2022, £1,275.35 for October 2022, £1,280.05 for November 2022, and £1,280.25 for December 2022.
The tribunal also provided that the respondent could deduct income tax and employee national insurance contributions, if any, required by law before payment, provided those sums were remitted to HMRC and written evidence was supplied to the claimant. Payment of the balance after any lawful deductions would satisfy the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the award was stated as a gross sum covering deductions from wages for September to December 2022. | Upheld | — | £5,111 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,111
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.