Case 4108530/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108530/2021 Mr I Young v Midlothian Utilities Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4108530/2021
- Decision date
- 12 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108530/2021 Mr I Young
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the material available, Employment Judge Frances Eccles found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,242.00.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £792.00. Those are the only monetary awards recorded in the judgment.
The claims for a redundancy payment and notice pay were dismissed. The extracted text gives no further reasoning for the dismissal of those claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,242 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £792 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to a dismissed claim for notice pay; no further breakdown or reasoning is given in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,034
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.