Case 4108538/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108538/2022 Miss I Schueler v The Watershed on the Canal — 2023
- Case reference
- 4108538/2022
- Decision date
- 22 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peter O'Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108538/2022 Miss I Schueler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so Employment Judge Peter O'Donnell determined the case on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that The Watershed on the Canal had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss I Schueler's wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £232. The hearing listed for 30 March 2023 was cancelled. The judgment is dated 15 March 2023 and was entered in the register on 22 March 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 on the available material after no response was presented. | Upheld | — | £232 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £232
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.