Case 4108559/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr V Lazerevas v JH Transport Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4108559/2022
- Decision date
- 18 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey
- Venue
- chambers in Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr V Lazerevas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not defend the claim and did not attend the case management preliminary hearing. After the tribunal issued a note setting out the sums sought and received no response, the case proceeded on the material available. The tribunal found that the respondent had ceased paying the claimant and had ceased contact. On that basis, it found that 66 days' wages remained unpaid at £120 per day, producing £7,920 gross, and that six days' holiday pay remained due at £120 per day, producing £720 gross.
The tribunal held that the wages claim succeeded as an unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also held that accrued but untaken holiday pay could be ordered under the Working Time Regulations 1998, referring to regulations 13, 13A and 14. The award was made in gross figures, subject to deductions required by law.
The tribunal rejected the claimant's request for compensation for 'lost time and lost savings debt and unemployment insurance due', saying that this was not something it had power to compensate. It then recorded that the claimant confirmed those were all the sums he was seeking and that the remaining claims were dismissed. The judgment does not separately analyse those dismissed claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared an unlawful deduction from wages for 66 unpaid days at £120 per day. | Upheld | — | £7,920 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 for 6 days at £120 per day. | Upheld | — | £720 |
| Unfair dismissal | Inferred from the gov.uk jurisdiction listing and the tribunal's statement that the remaining claims were dismissed; the judgment does not separately analyse this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Inferred from the gov.uk jurisdiction listing and the tribunal's statement that the remaining claims were dismissed; the judgment does not separately analyse this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,640
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998 regs 13, 13A and 14
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.