Case 4108560/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108560/2022 Miss T McPhee v WMCG Pub Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4108560/2022
- Decision date
- 3 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108560/2022 Miss T McPhee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued after two service attempts and no response from the respondent. On the material available, Employment Judge P O'Donnell found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £168.75, calculated as 13.5 hours at £12.50 gross per hour.
The judge also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. Damages for notice were awarded at £5,024.88, based on 12 weeks at £418.74 gross. The judgment separately found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,537.50, calculated as 18 weeks' pay at £418.74 gross.
A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The tribunal ordered payment of £771.25, calculated as 61.7 hours at £12.50 gross per hour. The total monetary award reflected in the judgment is £13,502.38.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Ordered under rule 21; 13.5 hours at £12.50 gross per hour. | Upheld | — | £169 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay damages awarded; calculated as 12 weeks at £418.74 gross. | Upheld | — | £5,025 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment awarded; calculated as 18 weeks' pay at £418.74 gross. | Upheld | — | £7,538 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday entitlement payment awarded; calculated as 61.7 hours at £12.50 gross per hour. | Upheld | — | £771 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,502
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.