Case 4108563/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108563/2022 Miss R Anderson v Rujia Marketing Consultants Ltd (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 4108563/2022
- Decision date
- 14 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108563/2022 Miss R Anderson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that Rujia Marketing Consultants Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss R Anderson's wages and ordered the respondent to pay £610 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £85 gross. The hearing listed for 17 March 2023 was cancelled. The judgment does not record any additional reasoning, disputed evidence, or separate legal test beyond the rule 21 determination on the material before the tribunal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £610 gross. | Upheld | — | £610 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £85 gross. | Upheld | — | £85 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £695
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.