Case 4108653/2012 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108653/2012 Ms L Chadwick v Represented by: Thompsons West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust — 2017
- Case reference
- 4108653/2012
- Decision date
- 12 December 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108653/2012 Ms L Chadwick
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records only that Ms L Chadwick’s claim against West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust was withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, Employment Judge Frances Eccles dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings of fact, liability conclusions, or remedy assessment are set out in the text provided. The decision therefore functions as a procedural disposal rather than a determination of the merits of any underlying complaint.
The extracted judgment also does not identify the underlying cause of action, so the claim is recorded here as `other` on a conservative basis.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive legal claim type; it only records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.