Case 4108667/2012 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Curley v Unrepresented West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust — 2018
- Case reference
- 4108667/2012
- Decision date
- 11 June 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Curley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 11 May 2018 the tribunal gave Miss M Curley an opportunity to provide written reasons by 18 May 2018, or to request a hearing, to address why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that she did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim.
No monetary award was made. The decision is limited to case management and strike out, dated 11 June 2018.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment does not describe the substantive claim in detail, but the gov.uk listing categorises it as an Equal Pay Act matter. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.