Case 4108698/2012 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Grace v Unrepresented West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust — 2018
- Case reference
- 4108698/2012
- Decision date
- 11 June 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Grace
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 11 May 2018 the tribunal gave Mrs C Grace an opportunity to provide written reasons by 18 May 2018, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that she did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). No substantive findings were made on the underlying merits, and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the body of the text; this classification follows the case listing/category supplied with the file, which identified the matter as Equal Pay Act. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.