Case 4108745/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108745/2015 & Others Mr G Ferrier & Others (See multiple schedule) v Wyman-Gordon Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4108745/2015
- Decision date
- 16 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108745/2015 & Others Mr G Ferrier & Others (See multiple schedule)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment covers multiple linked cases: 4108745/2015 Mr Gordon Ferrier, 4108746/2015 Mr Gavin Jackson, and 4108747/2015 Mr Thomas Thompson, all against Wyman-Gordon Limited. Employment Judge Robert Gall recorded the matters as claims brought by the claimants in a multiple schedule.
The tribunal stated that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants. On that basis, it dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive findings on liability or remedy were recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claims were withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The case heading and gov.uk listing indicate a Working Time Regulations matter, but the judgment text itself does not specify the underlying statutory basis. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.