Case 4108754/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Cameron Miller v Rhys Davies and Sons Limited (In Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 4108754/2021
- Decision date
- 26 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Alexander
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Cameron Miller
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued judgment under rule 21 on the available material. It found that Cameron Miller and David Colman were employees dismissed as redundant, that none of the situations in s.189(1)(a), (b) or (c) applied, that the respondent was in administration, and that the administrator consented to the proceedings continuing by email dated 12 July 2021. No response was presented within the applicable time limit.
The tribunal held that the complaint that the respondent failed to comply with sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded. It found that the respondent had dismissed more than 20 employees at one establishment within 90 days or less, had not ensured that employee representatives were elected under s.188A, and had not consulted with them under s.188.
A protective award was made in respect of both claimants and the respondent was ordered to pay remuneration for the protected period. The protected period began on 8 December 2020 in Mr Colman's case and on 23 December 2020 in Mr Miller's case, and lasted 90 days in each case. The judgment does not state a quantified monetary total.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal said the complaint was well founded and ordered remuneration for a protected period, but it did not state a quantified monetary amount. The protected period began on 8 December 2020 in Mr Colman's case and 23 December 2020 in Mr Miller's case, and lasted 90 days in each case. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.188 TULR(C)A 1992
- s.188A TULR(C)A 1992
- s.189(1)(a)-(c) TULR(C)A 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.