Case 4108873/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Brady v Johns The Quality Butchers Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4108873/2019
- Decision date
- 28 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Brady
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mrs M Brady was unfairly dismissed by Johns The Quality Butchers Ltd. It awarded a basic award of £3,940.80 and a compensatory award of £4,111.50. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 applied to the compensatory award. The prescribed element was £2,989.52 for the period 31 May 2020 to 7 January 2021, and the balance was £8,524.83.
The tribunal also ordered notice pay of £2,411.17 and a separate payment of £1,050.88 because the claimant had not been issued with a written statement of employment particulars. The total award stated in the judgment was £11,514.35.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Awarded a basic award of £3,940.80 and a compensatory award of £4,111.50. | Upheld | — | £8,052 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was ordered; the extracted judgment does not expressly repeat the complaint label, but this appears to be the notice-pay claim. | Upheld | — | £2,411 |
| Other | Award made because the claimant had not been issued with a written statement of employment particulars. | Upheld | — | £1,051 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,514
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,941
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,112
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.