Mrs Amanda Prior v Unisono UK Ltd — 2021

Case reference: 4108996/2021
Decision date: 29 September 2021
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Hendry

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs Amanda Prior

Respondent

Unisono UK Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal held that the claimant's unfair (constructive dismissal) complaint was presented out of time. It was not satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable for the complaint to be presented in time, or within a reasonable period thereafter, so that claim was dismissed.

The tribunal also held that the claimant's race discrimination claims were out of time. It was not satisfied that it would be just and equitable to exercise discretion to allow those claims to proceed late, and those claims were therefore dismissed. No remedy was awarded.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	Dismissed because the claim was brought out of time and the claimant had not satisfied the tribunal that it was not reasonably practicable to present the complaint in time or within a reasonable time thereafter.	Dismissed	—	—
Race discrimination	Dismissed because the race discrimination claims were not brought in time and the claimant had not satisfied the tribunal that it was just and equitable to allow them to proceed late.	Dismissed	Race	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.