Case 4109062/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4109062/2019 Miss M Elliot v Glasgow City Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 4109062/2019
- Decision date
- 5 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4109062/2019 Miss M Elliot
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant's solicitors had withdrawn, and the claimant did not respond to a Tribunal status enquiry asking her to confirm her intention regarding the claim. A strike out warning letter sent on 15 June 2023 was returned because the claimant no longer lived at the address given on the ET1, and she had not notified the Tribunal of a new address.
The Tribunal recorded that it could not communicate with the claimant or give notice under rule 37(2), and assumed in those circumstances that she no longer wished to pursue the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The gov.uk listing category indicates Equal Pay Act. The judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' and records that it was struck out for not being actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(2) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.