Case 4109080/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Member J McCaig Tribunal Member N Richardson Mrs Gillian Ewart-Bannister v Represented by Mr A Bannister Husband Aberdeenshire Council — 2022
- Case reference
- 4109080/2021
- Decision date
- 5 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp Tribunal
- Panel members
- J McCaig, N Richardson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Member J McCaig Tribunal Member N Richardson Mrs Gillian Ewart-Bannister
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by Aberdeenshire Council as a Primary School teacher and Principal Teacher at Strathdon Primary School. The tribunal heard evidence about difficulties at the school, including incidents involving pupils and a parental complaint, but it treated the serious allegation arising from the 5 December 2019 incident as a separate matter. It found the suspension and investigation into that allegation were appropriate, but they were not the basis of the dismissal found by the tribunal.
The tribunal held that the claimant resigned in circumstances amounting to constructive dismissal under section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996. It found that, after the claimant had been off work with stress and had medical and occupational health advice stating that she was not fit to work or attend formal meetings, the respondent continued to arrange capability hearings. The tribunal accepted that the respondent should have deferred the process, especially once the claimant had become unable to attend and had tried, unsuccessfully, to prepare a written submission. It concluded that the respondent’s conduct breached the implied term of trust and confidence and that the dismissal was unfair under section 98(4).
On the Equality Act claims, the tribunal held that the dismissal was because of something arising in consequence of the claimant’s disability, and that the respondent knew or ought reasonably to have known of the disability from 17 June 2020. It found that the attendance management policy and related capability process were applied to her, and that this placed her at a substantial disadvantage because she was unable to engage with the process in the way a non-disabled employee could. The only reasonable adjustment it found established on the evidence was a deferral of the capability hearing until the treatment recommended to the claimant had taken place. It held that extending sick pay was not a reasonable adjustment in the circumstances.
On remedy, the tribunal declined reinstatement or re-engagement. It awarded a basic award of £4,842 for unfair dismissal and made no compensatory award because it found no recoverable financial loss on the evidence before it. For the discrimination claim, it awarded £10,000 for injury to feelings at the low end of the middle Vento band, plus £933 interest, and made a declaration under section 124 of the Equality Act 2010. The total award was £15,775.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Constructive dismissal under section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996. The tribunal held the respondent breached the implied term of trust and confidence by proceeding with capability hearings when the claimant was unfit to attend or participate, and found the dismissal unfair under section 98(4). The award was a basic award only. | Upheld | — | £4,842 |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held the dismissal was something arising in consequence of disability, that the respondent failed to make the reasonable adjustment of deferring the capability hearing, and that the treatment was not a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. The award comprised £10,000 for injury to feelings plus £933 interest; no financial loss award was made. | Upheld | Disability | £10,933 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,775
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,842
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Legal tests applied
10 references- Western Excavating test
- Malik trust and confidence term
- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Basildon & Thurrock NHS Foundation Trust v Weerasinghe
- City of York Council v Grosset
- Sheikholeslami v University of Edinburgh
- Environment Agency v Rowan
- Latif
- Vento bands
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.