Case 4109098/2021 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109098/2021(V) Held on February 2022 Employment Judge N M Hosie Miss K Mckee v Plus Fitness Ltd t/a Anytime Fitness — 2022
- Case reference
- 4109098/2021
- Decision date
- 10 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Hosie Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109098/2021(V) Held on February 2022 Employment Judge N M Hosie Miss K Mckee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing held on 8 February 2022, Employment Judge N M Hosie determined the claimant's employment status. The tribunal's judgment states that, for the reasons given orally at the hearing, Miss K Mckee was an employee of Plus Fitness Ltd t/a Anytime Fitness within section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The written judgment does not record any substantive determination of dismissal, wages, working time, or breach of contract claims. It records only the employee-status ruling and does not set out any monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | At the preliminary hearing, the tribunal held that the claimant was an employee of the respondent company within s.230(1) ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.230(1) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.