Case 4109099/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109099/2019 Mrs S Boyle v Tiffany Carberry — 2019
- Case reference
- 4109099/2019
- Decision date
- 30 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge C McManus Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109099/2019 Mrs S Boyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 for non-compliance with rule 37(1)(c). On 13 September 2019 the Tribunal required the claimant to provide information about the statutory basis of her claims by 27 September 2019. A reminder email followed on 1 October 2019, requiring a response by 8 October 2019.
When there was still no response, the Tribunal sent a strike-out warning letter on 9 October 2019 requiring a response by 23 October 2019. The claimant did not respond to the Tribunal, did not give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge C McManus ordered that the claim be struck out. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying statutory claim type. The Tribunal required the claimant to provide information about the statutory basis of her claims, but she did not respond. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(c)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.