Case 4109118/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109118/2021 Mr G Tullis v Bridgeforth Engineering Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109118/2021
- Decision date
- 8 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge David Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109118/2021 Mr G Tullis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and an Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that Mr Tullis was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 27 October 2020.
It found that he had 35 full years' service at the time of dismissal and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £16,140.00. The judgment sets out the calculation as 30 weeks at £538 per week, the latter being the cap on a week's pay, with the claimant being aged 41 or older for the relevant period and the length of service capped at 20 years.
The listed hearing on 28 June 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 27 October 2020 and was found entitled to a redundancy payment based on 35 full years' service. | Upheld | — | £16,140 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,140
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.