Case 4109154/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Mohammad Sajid Nazir Rasheed v Represented by A Smith and D Leyden Student Advisers K Ilahi Interpreter QY Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109154/2019
- Decision date
- 22 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Mohammad Sajid Nazir Rasheed
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked as a waiter from 5 September 2018, usually five to six days a week and about 55 to 60 hours per week. He was not provided with written terms of employment. His employment transferred in March 2019 to QY51 Ltd, and the tribunal found QY51 Ltd was the correct respondent. The respondent did not attend the hearing.
The tribunal found that the claimant resigned on 19 April 2019 after raising irregularities about pay. It accepted that he was given monthly payslips showing a fixed daily rate of £52, but that his worked hours were not properly reflected and that the effect was payment below the applicable National Minimum Wage. On that basis, the tribunal held that he had suffered unlawful deductions of wages of £6,120.33 up to 14 April 2019 and a further £208 to 19 April 2019, making £6,328.33 in total.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had not taken paid holiday and had accrued holiday pay of £1,690.81. Separately, because no written terms of employment had been provided, it awarded a sum equivalent to two weeks' wages under s38 Employment Act 2002, calculated as 57.5 hours at £8.21 per hour, amounting to £944.15. The total award was therefore £8,963.29.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant had been underpaid below the applicable National Minimum Wage and sustained unlawful deductions of £6,120.33 up to 14 April 2019 and a further £208 to 19 April 2019. | Upheld | — | £6,328 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant did not take paid holidays and had accrued entitlement to holiday pay of £1,690.81. | Upheld | — | £1,691 |
| Other | The tribunal awarded an amount equivalent to two weeks' wages under s38 Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide written terms of employment. | Upheld | — | £944 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,963
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s 112 Insolvency Act 1986
- ss 1-4, 8, 13-27 and 210(5) Employment Rights Act 1996
- reg 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
- ss 17 and 28 National Minimum Wage Act 1998
- s 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.