Case 4109156/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Georgiev v No appearance Fife Law Centre — 2019
- Case reference
- 4109156/2019
- Decision date
- 5 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Georgiev
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Glasgow, Employment Judge A Kemp heard the respondent and proceeded in the claimant's absence after he did not attend. No formal oral evidence was given. The tribunal relied on the respondent's documents, the pleadings, and two further documents produced to establish when the dismissal was communicated. It found that Mr C Georgiev had been employed by Fife Law Centre as an administrator from 26 February 2015 and had been summarily dismissed by letter dated 8 March 2019, sent by email and received that day.
The tribunal held that the effective date of termination was 8 March 2019. It found that early conciliation began on 5 June 2019 and that the claim form was presented on 5 August 2019, which was one day outside the applicable time limit; the last day for presentation on time was 4 August 2019. Applying the statutory time-limit provisions and the 'not reasonably practicable' test, the tribunal found that Mr Georgiev had not shown that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claims within the primary period. It also noted that the claim form and schedule of loss did not indicate any other claim.
The tribunal therefore concluded that it had no jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal claim, the notice pay claim, or the claim understood to relate to sick pay, and dismissed the case. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction/time bar. The tribunal found the effective date of termination was 8 March 2019 and that the claim form was presented one day late. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The notice pay claim was treated as subject to the same time-bar issue under Regulation 7 of the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994 and was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as 'other sums due' understood to relate to sick pay. It was considered under section 23 ERA 1996 and dismissed on the same jurisdiction/time-bar basis. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- section 111(2) ERA 1996
- section 97 ERA 1996
- Regulation 7 of the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994
- section 23 ERA 1996
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend on Sea Borough Council
- Porter v Bandridge Ltd
- Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser
- Schultz v Esso Petroleum Company
- Marks and Spencer plc v Williams-Ryan
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.