Case 4109182/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Logan v West Dunbartonshire Council — 2018
- Case reference
- 4109182/2014
- Decision date
- 7 June 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Logan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that, after the claimant's solicitor withdrew from acting, it wrote to the claimant seeking her intentions about the future conduct of the proceedings. No response was received, and no response was received after a reminder was sent.
On 10 April 2018, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 24 April 2018 or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing category identifies Working Time Regulations, but the judgment itself does not describe the underlying substantive claim. The judgment records that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.