Case 4109195/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Deschamps v FBE Realisation 2021 Ltd (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 4109195/2021
- Decision date
- 15 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Deschamps
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland struck out Mr J Deschamps' claim against FBE Realisation 2021 Ltd (In Administration) under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The judgment states that the respondent company was in administration and that the consent of the administrator, or permission of the court, had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity on 17 January 2022 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for want of active pursuit. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. No substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim are recorded, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted text does not identify the substantive underlying claim type; the judgment records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.