Case 4109206/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Grove Retail Ltd T/a Shell Bawbee — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109206/2021
- Decision date
- 26 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rory McPherson
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFarhan Munawar was employed by Grove Retail Ltd t/a Shell Bawbee as a cashier from 4 May 2020 until 6 August 2020. He presented his claim on 15 April 2021 after ACAS early conciliation had run from 11 September 2020 to 11 October 2020. The tribunal identified that complaints about matters before 17 December 2020 were potentially out of time and that, under Porter v Bandridge Ltd, the burden was on the claimant to show that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the statutory time limit.
The tribunal also dealt with the hearing under Rule 47 of the 2013 Rules when the claimant did not rejoin the CVP hearing after the start. The clerk made enquiries by telephone, the respondent manager later attended and gave evidence, and the tribunal proceeded in the claimant's absence after considering the available information.
On the merits of jurisdiction and time limits, the tribunal held that the breach of contract claim for arrears of pay was not brought within three months of termination and so could not be considered under Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994. It also held that the claimant had not established that it was not reasonably practicable to present the unlawful deduction of wages claim in time under the ERA 1996 time limits. The claims for arrears of pay and other payments were therefore dismissed and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the claim was not brought within three months of termination; the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction under Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed as out of time. The tribunal held the claimant had not shown that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the primary time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Porter v Bandridge Ltd
- section 111(2)(a) & (b) ERA 1996
- section 207B ERA 1996
- Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994
- section 23(2) ERA 1996
- Rule 2 of the 2013 Rules
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.