Case 4109212/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Tribunal Member Mr G Doherty Tribunal Member Ms M McAllister Ms Kara Scobie v Scottish Ministers (Education Scotland) st and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 4109212/2021
- Decision date
- 25 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow
- Panel members
- Mr G Doherty, Ms M McAllister
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Tribunal Member Mr G Doherty Tribunal Member Ms M McAllister Ms Kara Scobie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat on 23 and 24 May 2022 for the start of an 11-day final hearing and first dealt with a late application by the claimant to amend claim 4113686/2021. The proposed amendment would have added a new paragraph alleging automatic unfair dismissal within section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, said to be linked to protected disclosures made to the second respondent between 2 and 7 October 2020. The majority of the tribunal, with Ms McAllister dissenting, refused the amendment.
In reaching that decision, the majority applied the Selkent amendment principles and considered the nature of the proposed amendment, timing, explanation for delay, potential prejudice, and the practical effect on the listed hearing. The tribunal said the claimant had been legally represented throughout, had had extensive time to particularise the case, and had not given a satisfactory explanation for only raising the section 103A issue at the start of the final hearing. It did not accept that the omission was merely a simple administrative error.
The tribunal also found that allowing the amendment would likely require further enquiry, additional witnesses, more time, and extra cost, and that the respondents would suffer greater hardship if the amendment were allowed than the claimant would suffer if it were refused. The tribunal referred to Selkent, Chandhok v Tirkey, Hesketh v GCU, New Star Asset Management Holdings Ltd v Evershed, and Pruzhanskaya v International Trade and Exhibitors (JV) Ltd in the course of its reasons.
After the oral ruling, the claimant indicated an intention to appeal to the EAT and asked for the final hearing to be adjourned. The respondents did not oppose that application. The tribunal therefore adjourned the final hearing to be relisted before the same tribunal after the appeal process, directed the claimant's solicitor to update the tribunal and respondents about the EAT application and its progress, and discharged the remaining hearing dates.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend the ET1 to add an automatic unfair dismissal claim under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 said to arise from protected disclosures made between 2 and 7 October 2020. This was a procedural ruling, not a determination of the merits of the claim. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Selkent factors
- Chandhok v Tirkey
- Hesketh v GCU
- New Star Asset Management Holdings Ltd v Evershed
- Pruzhanskaya v International Trade and Exhibitors (JV) Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.