Case 4109217/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Mulholland v Padaro (Scotland) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109217/2021
- Decision date
- 29 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Mulholland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge B Beyzade sat alone at Glasgow by CVP on 14 December 2021 and gave oral reasons. The tribunal found the claimant's complaint of breach of contract in respect of notice pay well founded and ordered Padaro (Scotland) Ltd to pay £99.23 gross, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance if required.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay. No separate remedy was awarded on that head, and the only monetary award recorded in the judgment was the £99.23 ordered for notice pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Failure to pay notice pay. The tribunal ordered payment of £99.23 gross, from which tax and national insurance are to be deducted if applicable and remitted to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £99 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £99
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.