Case 4109218/2021 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109218/2021 (A) Preliminary Hearing by Cloud Video Platform on January 2022 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Mr H Drummond v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue — 2022
- Case reference
- 4109218/2021
- Decision date
- 21 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M MacLeod Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109218/2021 (A) Preliminary Hearing by Cloud Video Platform on January 2022 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Mr H Drummond
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 18 January 2022, the tribunal determined whether Mr H Drummond was a disabled person within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time. The issue turned on evidence about intermittent syncope and pre-syncope over a period of years, including medical letters from 2017 to 2020, and the absence of any confirmed underlying diagnosis notwithstanding continuing investigations.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had a physical impairment consisting of syncope and pre-syncope. It found that the condition adversely affected normal day-to-day activities, including driving, travelling, conversations, standing and walking, and concentration. The tribunal treated driving as a normal day-to-day activity and took account of the claimant's DVLA licence suspension and the practical consequences of his inability to drive.
Applying section 6 of the Equality Act 2010, Schedule 1, and the 2011 statutory Guidance, the tribunal held that the effects were substantial and long-term because the episodes had recurred since at least 2017 and were likely to recur. It noted that the lack of a formal diagnosis did not prevent a finding of disability. The tribunal therefore concluded that Mr Drummond was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 and that the case should proceed accordingly.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary issue under section 6 Equality Act 2010; the tribunal held that the claimant was disabled at the material time. No substantive liability or remedy was determined. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- Guidance on matters to be taken into account in determining questions relating to the definition of disability (2011)
- paragraph 2 of Schedule 1
- paragraph C5 of the 2011 Guidance
- paragraph C9 of the 2011 Guidance
- Swift v Chief Constable of Wiltshire Constabulary
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP
- Chief Constable of Dumfries & Galloway v Adams
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.