Case 4109257/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4109257/2014 Mr J Hoving v Bilfinger Industrial Services UK Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109257/2014
- Decision date
- 10 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4109257/2014 Mr J Hoving
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 10 May 2021 Employment Judge Robert Gall struck out Mr J Hoving's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the strike-out was made under rule 37(1)(d).
The tribunal had previously given the claimant an opportunity on 16 April 2021 to provide written reasons by 30 April 2021, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing, so the tribunal struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive cause or causes of action; it only states that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. The GOV.UK listing for the case categories it as unlawful deduction from wages and working time, but that is not stated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.