Case 4109269/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109269/2018 Mr C Brodie v Crummock Scotland Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4109269/2018
- Decision date
- 8 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peter O’Donell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109269/2018 Mr C Brodie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Peter O’Donell recorded that Crummock Scotland Ltd had failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment states that the respondent was to pay the claimant remuneration for the protected period of 90 days from 1 June 2018.
The extract does not set out any further narrative findings, hearing attendance, or dispute about the facts. It is limited to the tribunal’s formal determination and remedy direction. No separate monetary figure is included in the extracted text, so the amount payable cannot be broken down from the judgment excerpt provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and ordered payment of remuneration for the protected period of 90 days from 1 June 2018, but the extracted text does not state a monetary sum. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.