Case 4109279/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Moira Davidson v Rep Cat Property Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109279/2021
- Decision date
- 7 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Strain
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Moira Davidson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Ms Moira Davidson was unfairly dismissed by Cat 1 Property Ltd. The judgment records that the hearing was held by CVP on 25 June 2021 before Employment Judge A Strain, with the claimant represented by a trade union representative and the respondent appearing in person.
The written reasons section in the extracted text states that oral reasons were given at the conclusion of the hearing, but the text provided does not set out those reasons in detail. The tribunal’s final order was that the unfair dismissal claim succeeded and that the respondent must pay the claimant a basic award of £4,185.60 and a compensatory award of £7,949.80.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award of £4,185.60 and a compensatory award of £7,949.80. | Upheld | — | £12,135 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,135
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,186
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,950
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.