Case 4109284/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Gamla v Limited (in Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 4109284/2021
- Decision date
- 17 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge O'Dempsey Anita
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Gamla
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the parties had reached a settlement. The hearing was adjourned and no action was to be taken to relist the case before 4 pm on Monday 21 March 2022 so that the settlement terms could be carried into effect.
The judgment further provided that, if neither party applied in writing for the case to be relisted before the deadline, the claim would stand dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, without the need for a further order. The judgment contains no findings on the merits of the claims and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the parties reached a settlement and provides for dismissal upon withdrawal if no relisting application was made by the stated deadline. No merits findings are made. | Settled | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Listed category was public interest disclosure. The judgment records settlement and contains no merits findings or separate outcome for this claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records settlement and contains no merits findings or separate outcome for this claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Listed category included Working Time Regulations and Written Statements. The judgment records settlement and contains no merits findings or separate outcome for this claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Other | This reflects the written statement aspect of the listed category. The judgment records settlement and contains no merits findings or separate outcome for this claim. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.