Case 4109285/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4109285/2021 Open Preliminary Hearing Held by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on September 2021 Employment Judge - A Strain Mr R Thompson v The Management Committee of Pollok Golf Club — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109285/2021
- Decision date
- 4 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alan Strain
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4109285/2021 Open Preliminary Hearing Held by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on September 2021 Employment Judge - A Strain Mr R Thompson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing by CVP on 21 September 2021, before Employment Judge Alan Strain, the tribunal considered the claimant's employment status. The claimant, Mr R Thompson, appeared in person and the respondent, The Management Committee of Pollok Golf Club, was represented by Ms Letts, consultant.
The tribunal's judgment was that the claimant had the status of an employee with the respondent from March 2017 until the date of termination of his employment. Oral reasons were given to the parties at the conclusion of the hearing.
No monetary remedy was recorded in this judgment, and the extracted text does not include any further substantive findings on the underlying claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Open preliminary hearing on the preliminary issue of employment status; the tribunal held that the claimant had the status of an employee with the respondent from March 2017 until the date of termination of his employment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.