Case 4109318/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Scott Baptie v Mr Mark Hutchison — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109318/2021
- Decision date
- 1 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Scott Baptie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Baptie, an HGV driver for 3D Transport, gave notice of resignation by text on 19 February 2021 after a discussion at the Tarmac site about a handle on the truck. The tribunal found that the effective date of termination was 26 February 2021 and that he resigned voluntarily. It did not accept that he had been dismissed or forced to resign, so the complaint under s.100 ERA 1996 of automatically unfair dismissal for health and safety reasons failed.
The tribunal considered the pleaded health and safety allegations under s.100(1)(d) and (e), together with the constructive dismissal authorities it cited, including Western Excavating and Lewis v Motorworld Garages. It preferred the respondent's evidence about the vehicle repairs, the claimant's daily checks, and the fact that concerns were not reported timeously. On that evidence, the tribunal held that the claimant had not established either a reasonable belief in serious and imminent danger or any fundamental breach by the respondent.
On pay, the tribunal accepted the respondent's account that wages were paid weekly and that the claimant had been paid for the two weeks of holiday over Christmas 2020. It found no unpaid wages, overtime, or holiday pay outstanding at termination. The tribunal also noted that the claimant's references to stress could not form part of an unfair dismissal compensatory award under Dunnachie. All heads of claim were dismissed and no compensation was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim was clarified as an automatically unfair dismissal complaint under s.100(1)(d) and (e) ERA 1996. The tribunal found the claimant resigned voluntarily on 19 February 2021, was not dismissed, and the effective date of termination was 26 February 2021. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant had been paid his wages and did not prove any outstanding wages or overtime remained due at termination. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had been paid a full week's holiday pay for the Christmas 2020 holiday period and did not establish any further holiday pay due on termination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.100(1)(d) ERA 1996
- s.100(1)(e) ERA 1996
- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Lewis v Motorworld Garages Ltd
- Smith v Hayle Town Council
- Ross v Eddie Stobart Ltd
- Oudhar v Esporta Group Ltd
- Dunnachie v Kingston upon Hull City Council
- Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 30
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.