Case 4109321/2021 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Ms S Macdonald v Falkirk Community Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109321/2021
- Decision date
- 17 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murphy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Ms S Macdonald
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Macdonald was dismissed summarily on 30 January 2020 and the tribunal accepted that the normal unfair dismissal time limit expired on 29 April 2020. It found that she did not start ACAS early conciliation before that date, so there was no extension under s.207B of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The only issue the tribunal determined was whether it was not reasonably practicable for her to present the claim in time.
The tribunal found that the claimant knew she might bring an unfair dismissal claim while her internal appeal was ongoing, and that she had access to advice through her trade union representative and the CAB. It held that her mistaken belief that she had to wait for the appeal process to finish was not objectively reasonable, that the pending appeal did not by itself stop the limitation period, and that any failure by her union representative to warn her of the time limit was attributed to her under Dedman. The claimant's mental health difficulties and the pandemic restrictions were considered, but the tribunal found they did not prevent her from making enquiries or lodging in time.
The tribunal therefore concluded that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented the claim by 29 April 2020. Because that finding disposed of the limitation issue, it did not need to decide whether the later presentation in April 2021 was within a reasonable further period. The complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claim was presented out of time and the tribunal was not satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable to lodge it by the statutory deadline; the tribunal therefore held it had no jurisdiction to hear the complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.111 ERA 1996
- s.207B ERA 1996
- not reasonably practicable test
- Dedman principle
- Bodha special facts approach
- Palmer approach
- Wall's Meat v Khan
- Trevelyans (Birmingham) Ltd v Norton
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.