Case 4109363/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109363/2018 Mr R Brown v Represented by: Mr D Maguire - Solicitor SCB Vehicle Dismantlers — 2019
- Case reference
- 4109363/2018
- Decision date
- 21 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo Macleod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109363/2018 Mr R Brown
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R Brown brought claims against SCB Vehicle Dismantlers in case 4109363/2018. The only substantive disposition recorded in the judgment is that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimant.
The Employment Tribunal therefore dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not record any findings on liability, remedy, or separate reasoning by claim type.
The judgment is dated 18 October 2019, was entered in the register on 21 October 2019, and was copied to the parties. The judge was Employment Judge Murdo Macleod.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claims were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52; it does not specify separate findings by claim type. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claims were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52; it does not specify separate findings by claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claims were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52; it does not specify separate findings by claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claims were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52; it does not specify separate findings by claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.