Case 4109371/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Verlaque v Maplin Electronics (in administration) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4109371/2018
- Decision date
- 17 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Verlaque
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent was in administration. The tribunal recorded that neither the consent of the administrator nor permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. On 14 May 2019 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit.
The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37(i)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not make any merits findings or record any financial award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment disposes of the claim as a whole and does not itemise separate heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(i)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.