Case 4109425/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Angela Kemp v Represented by:15 Mr Chalmers, Partner Aberdeenshire Council — 2022
- Case reference
- 4109425/2021
- Decision date
- 12 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge McFatridge
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Angela Kemp
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Angela Kemp brought a claim that she had been unfairly constructively dismissed by Aberdeenshire Council. The tribunal heard evidence about earlier workplace friction involving Mr Hunter and Ms Scott, an incident in 2018 that led to mediation, and the events in 2020 when the claimant was suspended over alleged breaches of Covid regulations. The tribunal accepted that the claimant had found the process upsetting and that her health deteriorated, but it found that the respondent had acted in line with its procedures and with reasonable and proper cause.
On the evidence, the tribunal preferred the respondent witnesses where there was conflict. It found that the council had dealt with the 2018 difficulties through mediation, that Mr Gray was entitled to treat the 23 March 2020 altercation between Mr Hunter and a mechanic informally, and that the claimant’s suspension in May 2020 was justified by the information available about her conduct during the first lockdown. The tribunal also accepted that there was a minor procedural failing in not nominating a specific contact person at the point of suspension, but it held that this did not amount to a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.
Applying section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996 and the authorities on constructive dismissal, including Western Excavating v Sharp, Woods v WM Car Services and Omilaju, the tribunal held that there was no fundamental breach of contract and no cumulative course of conduct capable of amounting to a breach of the implied term. It found that nothing at the facilitated meeting on 11 February 2021 could amount to a last straw. The claimant resigned on 18 February 2021, but the tribunal concluded that she was not entitled to resign without notice by reason of the respondent’s conduct. The claim was therefore dismissed and no award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Claim was pleaded as unfair constructive dismissal. The tribunal held that the claimant was not constructively dismissed and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating v Sharp
- Woods v WM Car Services
- London Borough of Waltham Forest v Omilaju
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.