Case 4109434/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Gilbert v Tradeteam — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109434/2014
- Decision date
- 27 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Gilbert
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity on 21 December 2020 to provide written reasons by 4 January 2021, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing, so the tribunal struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' being struck out for lack of active pursuit. This claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category rather than specified in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' being struck out for lack of active pursuit. This claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category rather than specified in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
- Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.