Case 4109462/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Beattie v Pegasus Power & Communications Ltd — 2017
- Case reference
- 4109462/2014
- Decision date
- 12 December 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Beattie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 23 November 2017 the tribunal gave Mr G Beattie an opportunity to provide written reasons by 7 December 2017 explaining why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing on that issue. The claimant did neither. The tribunal found that he had failed to give an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out and therefore made a strike-out order under rule 37 of the 2013 Rules.
The judgment records that the basis for strike out was that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). No substantive determination of the underlying dispute is recorded, and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type. It states only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.