Case 4109548/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Member Lorraine Brown Tribunal Member Vernon Alexander Ms K Scott v HBOS plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 4109548/2021
- Decision date
- 16 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Porter Tribunal
- Venue
- Edinburgh
- Panel members
- Lorraine Brown, Vernon Alexander
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Member Lorraine Brown Tribunal Member Vernon Alexander Ms K Scott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant applied to change her working pattern so that she worked Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday rather than Monday, Wednesday and Friday. The respondents refused the request on the basis that Fridays were among the busiest days at the Hawick branch and that the change would have a detrimental effect on customer demand and management support.
The Tribunal accepted that Friday was a busier day in the Hawick branch, while also finding that Tuesdays were busy days in the respondents' Borders branches. However, it found that the respondents were not factually correct in concluding that the claimant's absence on Fridays would have a detrimental effect on their ability to meet customer demand. The Tribunal preferred evidence from a Grade B Supervisor who worked in the Banking Hall and found that reducing managers from three to two had not caused such a detrimental effect.
On remedy, the Tribunal considered that the respondents had followed a process, but also noted that the original decision-maker had not made enquiries of Banking Hall staff, had not shown the claimant the statistics relied on, and that the appeal decision-maker made no independent enquiries. It also noted that the suggested compromise did not resolve the claimant's childcare issue and that job share or a trial period had not been explored. It awarded six weeks' gross wages as just and equitable compensation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flexible working | Claim under s80H(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996 that rejection of the flexible working application was based on incorrect facts. Tribunal declared the claim well founded and awarded six weeks' gross wages. | Upheld | — | £2,140 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,140
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s80H Employment Rights Act 1996
- s80I Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 6 Flexible Working Regulations 2014
- Commotion Ltd v Rutty
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.