Case 4109556/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4109556/2021 Mrs H Shand v My Care (Grampian) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109556/2021
- Decision date
- 9 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Hosie Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4109556/2021 Mrs H Shand
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mrs H Shand's claim against My Care (Grampian) Limited under Rule 37. The judgment records that the strike out was made because of non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 2 August 2021 under Rule 37(1)(c) and because the claim had not been actively pursued under Rule 37(1)(d).
On 26 November 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 3 December 2021 or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing, so the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records Employment Judge N Hosie, with judgment dated 9 December 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 2 August 2021 and for not being actively pursued under Rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37
- Rule 37(1)(c)
- Rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.