Case 4109604/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109604/2019 Mr K Parker v Border Cars Group Ltd (in Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109604/2019
- Decision date
- 9 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge David Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109604/2019 Mr K Parker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment on the available material because no response had been presented by the respondent, Border Cars Group Ltd (in Liquidation). Employment Judge David Hoey determined the wages, notice pay, holiday entitlement, and unfair dismissal complaints without a hearing.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £472.32, calculated as 8 days' pay at £59.04 per day. It also upheld the breach of contract complaint in respect of notice and awarded £1,279.20, described as one month's notice pay due under the claimant's contract of employment.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £767.52, calculated as 13 days at £59.04 per day. The unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed because the claimant did not have the required two years' qualifying service.
The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £2,519.04, made up of the three successful money claims. The judgment does not record any separate award for basic award, compensatory award, interest, or injury to feelings.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of 8 days' pay at £59.04 per day. | Upheld | — | £472 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded one month's notice pay under the contract of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,279 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of 13 days at £59.04 per day. | Upheld | — | £768 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint failed because the claimant did not have the required two years' qualifying service. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,519
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.