Case 4109611/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Dylan Coates v The Crab Company (Scotland) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109611/2021
- Decision date
- 7 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Dylan Coates
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented claims on 16 May 2021 complaining of unfair dismissal and alleging arrears of pay. The respondents defended the claim on 15 June 2021. On 18 June 2021 Employment Judge O'Donnell directed the claimant to provide further information about the basis on which the tribunal could hear the unfair dismissal complaint, and further reminders and directions followed on 12 July 2021, 3 August 2021, and 23 August 2021. No reply was received from the claimant or on his behalf, and no hearing was requested to explain why the claim should not be struck out.
Employment Judge Ian McPherson struck out only the unfair dismissal part of the claim under Rule 37. The judgment records that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine an ordinary unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have two years' qualifying service under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and no exception to the qualifying period was advanced. The judge also noted that the claimant appeared to have autism and dyslexia, as disabilities recorded on the ET1, but concluded that strike out was still appropriate at that stage because the unfair dismissal complaint had no reasonable prospect of success, had not been properly pursued, and had not complied with the tribunal's orders.
The unlawful deduction from wages part of the claim, brought under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, was not struck out by this judgment. It was stated to remain unaffected and to continue subject to the unless order issued separately on the same date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under Rule 37 on the basis that the claimant had less than two years' qualifying service and had not complied with orders to explain the legal basis for an unfair dismissal claim; the unlawful deduction from wages claim was not determined and continued under the unless order. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- Rule 37(1)(a)
- Rule 37(1)(c)
- Rule 37(1)(d)
- Rule 2 overriding objective
- Section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Sections 94 to 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.