Case 4109638/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4109638/2014 Ms E O'Connell v Culture & Sport T/a Glasgow Life — 2023
- Case reference
- 4109638/2014
- Decision date
- 12 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4109638/2014 Ms E O'Connell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Ms E O'Connell's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment records that this was a single-claim case between Ms E O'Connell and Culture & Sport T/a Glasgow Life.
On 15 June 2023 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 6 July 2023, or to request a hearing so that the Tribunal could consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore made the strike-out order. No monetary remedy was awarded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment does not state the substantive claim type in the extracted text; classified as equal_pay from the case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.