Case 4109657/2018 · Employment Tribunal
16 B(Scot) Rule judgment on liability, remedy to be determined at a hearing EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: S/4109657/2018 Mr H Cuddy v Rowan Drilling (UK) Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4109657/2018
- Decision date
- 28 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
16 B(Scot) Rule judgment on liability, remedy to be determined at a hearing EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: S/4109657/2018 Mr H Cuddy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on liability only. The tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mr H Cuddy, brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Rowan Drilling (UK) Limited, and that a copy of the claim form was sent to the respondent on 5 June 2018.
The respondent did not enter a response within the 28-day period. On the material available, the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made without a hearing on liability, but not on remedy. The judgment therefore held that the complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded.
The tribunal stated that the claimant's remedy would be determined at a later hearing before an Employment Judge. No compensatory or basic award was fixed in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded. The remedy was not determined in this judgment and was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.