Case 4109768/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109768/2021 Mrs J Harvey v Castlehill Vaults Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109768/2021
- Decision date
- 8 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109768/2021 Mrs J Harvey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found that Mrs J Harvey had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered Castlehill Vaults Limited to pay the balance of notice pay due as damages, assessed at £360.09 net of tax and other deductions.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £1,898.11 gross for that holiday entitlement. The hearing listed for 5 August 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent presented no response. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered payment of the balance of notice pay as damages, awarded net of tax and other deductions. | Upheld | — | £360 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent presented no response. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the sum awarded gross. | Upheld | — | £1,898 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,258
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.